Find funded academic paths without stitching together 40 browser tabs.
Schlr helps students search source-backed programs, professors, scholarships, and funding opportunities in one decision-friendly flow.
A calmer path from query to shortlist
The product experience is built to keep funding, freshness, and source quality near the decision instead of burying them across disconnected pages.
Search
AI scholarships in Germany
PhD in Computer Science
Example University | Germany | Machine Learning
Tuition, deadlines, professor alignment, and linked funding stay visible in one evaluation path instead of three separate research sessions.
Save
Manual academic discovery breaks down where the decision gets expensive.
Students are not just searching for a name. They are trying to judge fit, funding, trust, and next steps across pages that were never designed to work together.
Scattered facts
Program pages, faculty profiles, scholarships, and grants live on different sites, with different formats, and often without a clean path between them.
Hidden funding
Funding is often buried in department pages, PDF calls, or scholarship portals instead of being visible where students actually compare options.
Weak trust cues
Search results rarely make freshness, source quality, or evidence visible enough to support confident decisions.
Students need a decision surface, not another directory.
Schlr is built for the moment when someone needs to judge whether an opportunity is real, current, funded, and worth saving.
That is why the product keeps search broad, evaluation structured, and sign-in optional until the user chooses to save.
Schlr brings four high-value discovery surfaces into one flow.
The MVP stays focused: programs, professors, scholarships, and funding opportunities, all organized to reduce scattered research work.
Compare real academic options
See degree level, deadlines, tuition, and linked funding without treating every university website like a separate research project.
Find aligned research leads
Search for professors by topic, then evaluate research areas, affiliation, and funding signals in one calmer flow.
Surface funding faster
Bring scholarship coverage, deadlines, and eligibility context closer to the program decisions they actually influence.
Follow research money with context
Track grants, assistantships, and funding opportunities alongside the professors, labs, and programs they support.
Trust should feel visible, not implied.
Students should understand why a result deserves attention: source quality, freshness, funding clarity, and the path to deeper evidence all need to stay in view.
Source-backed by design
Schlr is built to keep important claims close to the source pages they came from.
Freshness stays visible
Deadline-sensitive pages should be evaluated with recency in view, not as stale static listings.
Funding gets first-class treatment
Funding signals stay near result summaries and detail pages because they drive real student choices.
Public browsing stays open
Users can discover and evaluate before any sign-in friction appears. Accounts matter when they choose to save.
Search. Evaluate. Save.
The landing page should mirror the actual product journey so the CTA promise stays honest.
01
Search broadly
Start from a query, not a sign-up wall. Use the app to search programs, professors, scholarships, and funding together.
02
Evaluate with trust
Open detail pages that keep canonical facts, funding cues, freshness, and evidence in view instead of scattering them across tabs.
03
Save the strongest fits
Shortlist what matters and keep the next decision close to the context that made it worth revisiting.
The public story is simple because the product does the heavy lifting underneath.
Schlr crawls trusted academic sources, normalizes what matters, and presents it in a search experience that keeps evaluation context intact.
Search broadly
Start from a query, not a sign-up wall. Use the app to search programs, professors, scholarships, and funding together.
Evaluate with trust
Open detail pages that keep canonical facts, funding cues, freshness, and evidence in view instead of scattering them across tabs.
Save the strongest fits
Shortlist what matters and keep the next decision close to the context that made it worth revisiting.
Early questions should have clear answers.
The marketing site should remove doubt quickly, not hide the product behind vague startup language.
What does Schlr actually help me search?
Schlr focuses on four surfaces in MVP: programs, professors, scholarships, and funding opportunities.
Do I need an account before I can use it?
No. Public discovery stays open. Sign-in only becomes relevant when you want to save and revisit shortlisted options.
Why is trust such a visible theme?
Because academic decisions are expensive in time and money. Source quality, freshness, and funding clarity need to stay visible while you compare.
Open the app when you are ready to turn scattered research into a sharper shortlist.
Search first. Evaluate with trust. Save only when the option is strong enough to revisit.